Skip to main content

Being Uncomfortable

The concept of training is familiar to every athlete. There are countless ways in which to train; a plethora of strategies and schools of thought on how to go about it. However, they all have at least one common element: in order to improve, the trainee must commit to making himself uncomfortable in every session, day after day after day. In fact, my dad once said he thought of that point where you get uncomfortable as the starting point of the workout, and the pushing you do after that is the deciding element for the gains you make. Every workout, the athlete willingly takes on a load (be it weight, time, distance, etc.) that is progressively more difficult. The goal is that bearing a certain load become much easier and the athlete become more proficient at bearing it. Another common element of training is one that is pretty obvious but still important: timing. You have to train–choose to take on the load–with a fair amount of foresight; you have to start training long before the time comes to perform.

It works. Athletes do amazing things; sure, sometimes they perform at levels so much higher than they have ever trained, but no 'great' will ever tell you they got where they are without dedication to their training.

One day I started thinking things like this: Why do I not train myself in every aspect of daily life in which I want to perform at a higher level? If I really want it to be easier to bear a load, then why wouldn't I take on the load willingly long before it becomes necessary? And most especially, why would I expect the load to be easy once it comes if I didn't train for it? In other words, how naive do I have to be in order to be surprised when life isn't easy?

So here is my idea: Since hard things in life make us uncomfortable–and I often wonder if that is what bothers us about them–then becoming comfortable with being uncomfortable is something for which we can train. Everyday, pick harmless things to do that will make you uncomfortable and force yourself to take them on. Take an ice-cold shower simply because. Run up every flight of stairs you find. Sit with and talk to the most awkward person in the room and really dive into the conversation. Sleep on the floor with the lights on. Spend a night in the woods with nothing but what you happen to have on your person. Whatever makes you uncomfortable for no good reason, make yourself do it.

Of course, I don't know if this actually works because I'm too comfortable with how things are to really commit to it, but I am convinced that if I were to do this everyday for the rest of my life, I would be positively unflappable in just a few short years. Our modern lives find us obsessed with comfort–what if we learned to revel in discomfort?

Comments

  1. I think this was the biggest advantage of Special Forces training. My discomfort threshold went up. You are right, it does give you a certain unflappability if you can stick to it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Being Offensive and Responsibility

It's always irked me when someone raises the stakes in an argument and says "you've offended me!" I understand that some things are just plain offensive–filthy sexual jokes, shirts with senseless hateful messages on them, tasteless halloween costumes –but it seems to me that the widely held belief is that these things are wrong because they are offensive . This, I believe, is dangerously false. The above list of things are not wrong because they are offensive; they are offensive because they are wrong . This is an important distinction. Stating it this way makes it clear that "offending" someone in and of itself is amoral. It alone is neither right nor wrong; it is just the result of their reaction to your words or actions. That being said, context and care for how someone will receive something is always in good order and is an ever-essential part of Christian charity. But I want to talk about those things which we say to or do in front of our peers...

Sin

"I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts..." The dominant understanding about what 'sin' is among non-Christians, lapsed Christians, and far too many practicing Christians is that 'sin' is primarily a list of things that are "bad to do." Though this understanding isn't wrong, it is woefully incomplete after childhood ends. If this view of sin never matures, than we encounter a host of confusion in our lives, are left baffled by apparent tragedy and failure, and will never grasp the first things about human nature. Under this understanding, Christianity as a whole quickly becomes absolutely prohibitive and cruel. Take homosexuals, for example. You've got these two men who seem really, really , nice. They appear happy and functional. They are patient and civilized, even in the face of judgmental accusations of "sin" hurled at them. And to top it all off, they believe they are in love . What stands in the way of...

Words: Family

Words, like all good things–people, for instance–have and convey by their very existence  meaning . That is why language can be foul. That is why words of love can make us cry with deep emotion. The age of the internet has given rise to a whole new set of words that have and convey meaning that simply didn't exist before. I think this is an example of the correct use of language; it's function is to convey what is meant. If you want to mean something new, you come up with a new word. However, I don't think that attaching new meanings to already existing words or new words to old meanings is such a good practice. Why? What could be the harm of just changing the meaning of a word? Or expanding it a little? Simple: The harm is that we don't just use words to express our thoughts, we think in words , and changing the meaning of words is a subversive attempt to change the way we think about things . First example: Family Family. You can call things whatever you want, y...